People v. Gilligan
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Memorandum. The order of the Appellate Division should be reversed and a new trial ordered.
It was error for the trial court to deny defense counsel’s request to inspect, for possible use on cross-examination, the written notes and reports made by the several police officers in the course of their investigation (People v Persico, 24 NY2d 758; People v Malinsky, 15 NY2d 86, 90-91; People v Rosario, 9 NY2d 286; see Jencks v United States, 353 US 657; cf. CPL art 240). Reliance on the in camera finding that the material had "nothing in it exculpatory to the defendant” was not in accord with our…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Jencks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- People v. RosarioNew York Court of Appeals · 1961
- People v. MalinskyNew York Court of Appeals · 1965
- People v. HawaNew York Court of Appeals · 1963
- People v. HawaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1962
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- People v. RanghelleNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
- People v. PooleNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
- People v. WallaceNew York Court of Appeals · 1990
- People v. WashingtonNew York Court of Appeals · 1995
- People v. ParanzinoNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.