Legal Opinion
Wilson v. Hess Oil Virgin Islands Corp.
Superior Court of The Virgin Islands
Decided August 23, 2017No. Case No. SX-13-CV-480Published
1Opinion of the CourtMolloy, Judge
MEMORANDUM OPINION
(August 23, 2017)
BEFORE THE COURT is a motion filed by Defendants Hess Oil Virgin Islands Corporation (“HOVIC”) and Hess Corporation (“Hess”) to compel Plaintiff Andrew Wilson to undergo a CT scan of his chest “to determine whether or not there is any objective evidence of lung disease.” (Defs.’ Mot. to Compel Chest CT Scan of Wilson 5, filed June 1, 2017 (hereinafter “Mot.”).) Wilson opposes. For the reasons stated below, the Court will deny the motion to compel.
I. BACKGROUND
Andrew Wilson alleges he was exposed to asbestos during the years he worked at the oil refinery on…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Gasperini v. Center for Humanities, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Schlagenhauf v. HolderSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- In RE LEROY RICHARDS, AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000
- VEGA BY MUNIZ v. PiedilatoSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1998
- Vanterpool v. Government of the Virgin IslandsSupreme Court of The Virgin Islands · 2015
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.