Legal Opinion

Hennigar v. Van Every

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided March 23, 1959No. 18311PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Knauss

In the trial court plaintiff in error was plaintiff and defendant in error was defendant. We shall refer to the parties as they there appeared, or by name.

Plaintiff brought this action to recover damages for the alleged wrongful death of her husband resulting from an automobile accident. It is conceded that plaintiff’s husband was a guest in defendant’s 1951 Cadillac automobile at the time he met his death on November 4, 1956. Defendant’s answer set up the guest statute, C.R.S. ’53, 13-9-1, and other defenses, not here urged. At the close of all the testimony in the case the trial court…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Millington v. HiedloffSupreme Court of Colorado · 1935
  2. Foster v. ReddingSupreme Court of Colorado · 1935
  3. Parker v. City and County of DenverSupreme Court of Colorado · 1953
  4. Clark v. HicksSupreme Court of Colorado · 1953
  5. Jaeckel v. FunkSupreme Court of Colorado · 1943

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Ferguson v. GardnerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1976
  2. Gast v. City of FountainColorado Court of Appeals · 1994
  3. Sheldon v. HiginbothamSupreme Court of Colorado · 1968
  4. Bickel v. SteelySupreme Court of Colorado · 1960
  5. Gast v. City of FountainColorado Court of Appeals · 1994

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API