Montijo v. Samuel Goldwyn, Inc.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtMarks, J.
In 1925 appellant was the owner of a four-passenger cabin airplane of the biplane type. Respondent was engaged in producing moving pictures. In the fall of 1925 respondent was filming a picture known as “Partners Again”, one of a “Potash and Perlmutter” series. The plot of the story included an act which involved an airplane and an automobile rushing toward each other at rapid speeds with the airplane avoiding a collision by zooming over the automobile and just missing it. This was characterized as a “stunt” which was intended to give a “thrill” to an audience by the apparent and actual…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Green v. SouleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
- Fidelity & Casualty Co. of New York v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
- Lammers v. Pacific Electric Ry. Co.California Supreme Court · 1921
- Jamison v. San Jose & Santa Clara RailroadCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880
- Stephens v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
3Cited by3 opinions
- Woodall v. Wayne Steffner Productions, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1962
- Dicken v. SoutherCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
- Steers v. City and County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931