Murphy v. Frinkman
New Mexico Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SUTIN, Judge.
This is just another rear end collision case in which plaintiff was driving the forward car, and defendant operated the car following plaintiff. The jury returned a verdict for defendant and plaintiffs appeal from the judgment entered. We affirm.
A.Facts most favorable to defendant.
Plaintiff and defendant were driving north in the left hand lane of San Mateo Boulevard in Albuquerque. The speed limit was 40 miles per hour. Both cars were travelling at about 34 miles per hour. Traffic was heavy and moving rapidly. As plaintiff and defendant approached the intersection yith…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Brown v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
- Ryan v. WestgardCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1975
- Proctor v. WaxlerNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1972
- Rhoades v. DeRosierCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1976
- Crouch v. MostNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1967
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Triple B Corp. v. Brown & Root, Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1987
- Strickland v. Roosevelt County Rural Electric CooperativeNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1980
- Dowell Division of Dow Chemical U.S.A. v. Del-Rio Drilling Programs, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 1988
- Cline v. Joy Mfg. Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1983
- Cline v. Joy Mfg. Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1983
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.