Legal Opinion

Faust v. Ladysmith-Hawkins School Systems

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided April 10, 1979No. 76-241PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHeffernan, J.

The appeal is from an order which denied Kristina L. Faust’s petition for a writ of mandamus to direct the school district to give effect to an alleged teaching contract between Faust and the district for the 1976-77 school year. The petition for the writ was dismissed by the court on July 22,1976.

Two questions are presented on this appeal. First, in circumstances where a teacher enters into a one-year contract with the understanding that the contract will not be renewed, is it necessary that the school district, nevertheless, comply with the notice and conference requirements of sec.…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Perry v. SindermannSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Hortonville Joint School District No. 1 v. Hortonville Education Ass'nSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. The Timken Roller Bearing Company v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1963
  5. State Ex Rel. DeLuca v. Common CouncilWisconsin Supreme Court · 1976

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. West Bend Education Ass'n v. Wisconsin Employment Relations CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Dobbs v. Joint School District No. 3Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Saenz v. MurphyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Bruton v. Ames Community School DistrictSupreme Court of Iowa · 1980
  5. Harkness v. Palmyra-Eagle School DistrictCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1990

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API