Legal Opinion
(PC) Thomas v. Fry
District Court, E.D. California
Decided September 3, 2019No. 2:19-cv-01041Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 OTIS MICHAEL THOMAS, No. 2:19-cv-1041 CKD P 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER 14 J.C. FRY, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and seeking relief pursuant to
42 U.S.C. § 18
1983. This proceeding was referred to this court by Local Rule 302 pursuant to
28 U.S.C. § 19
636(b)(1) and plaintiff has consented to have all matters in this action before a United States 20 Magistrate Judge. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(c). 21 Plaintiff requests leave to proceed in forma pauperis. Since…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Neitzke v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Ivey v. Board of Regents of University of AlaskaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1982
- Harry Franklin v. Ms. Murphy and Hoyt CuppCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
- Bartlett v. StricklandSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.