Legal Opinion

Marriage of DonCarlos v. DonCarlos

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided August 15, 1995No. C0-94-1935PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

AMUNDSON, Judge.

Michael DonCarlos appeals from a district court order denying his motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction. He contends that the district court lacked jurisdiction to issue the order, and that the district court abused its discretion and violated his due process rights by failing to conduct an evidentiary hearing. We affirm.

*820FACTS

In June 1989 the parties executed a marital termination agreement. The agreement specified the amount and duration of spousal maintenance and also stated that after the termination of maintenance payments, “each party thereafter waives all…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. In Re State & Regents Building Asbestos CasesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
  2. Loo v. LooSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1994
  3. Marriage of Stich v. StichSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
  4. Soucek v. BanhamCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1993
  5. Marriage of Stevens v. StevensCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1993

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. DonCARLOS v. DonCARLOSCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API