Legal Opinion
Matter of Arthur
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
Decided December 17, 1975No. 753DC421PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BRITT, Judge.
Appellant assigns as error the admission of the S.B.I. laboratory report into evidence, contending that G.S. 90-95 (g) as applied to him, a juvenile, is unconstitutional in that it deprives him of the right of confrontation and cross-examination of witnesses. We find no merit in the assignment.
G.S. 90-95(g) provides as follows: “Whenever matter is .submitted to the North Carolina State Bureau of Investigation Laboratory, (and other named laboratories) for chemical analysis to determine if the matter is or contains a controlled substance, the report of that analysis certified to…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- In Re GAULTSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Dutton v. EvansSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- McKeiver v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Howard v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1984
- In Re EadesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2001
- In Re LineberryCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002
- In Re ClappCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2000
- Matter of ChavisCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1976
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.