Legal Opinion

Equitable General Providing Co. v. Potter

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided December 15, 1897PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal by defendant from judgment of the First District Court.

1Opinion of the CourtMcAdam, J.

The two bicycles which, are the subject of this controversy were received from. the plaintiff under agreements dated May 6, 1896.

There were two separate writings ás to each bicycle; one signed by the plaintiff, the other by the defendant. In each of the two signed by the defendant and delivered to the plaintiff, the defendant certifies that he has rented from the plaintiff one Victor bicycle, to hold for the term of ten months, for the use and depreciation of ■ which he agrees to pay $105, as follows.: $5 cash, and $10 on the sixth day of each month. Each of such agreements then provides that…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Rogers v. . SmithNew York Court of Appeals · 1872
  2. Earle v. RobinsonNew York Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Brewer v. FordNew York Supreme Court · 1889

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Equitable General Providing Co. v. EisentragerAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1901
  2. Equitable General Providing Co. v. EisentragerAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1900
  3. Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. v. Novartis Pharma AGDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2022
  4. GateGuard, Inc. v. Amazon.com Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2024
  5. Weiss v. LeichterAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1909

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API