Legal Opinion

Equitable General Providing Co. v. Eisentrager

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided February 15, 1901PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Municipal Court of the city of New York, first district, borough of Manhattan, in favor of the plaintiff.

1Opinion of the CourtAndrews, P. J.

The action was brought to recover fifty-two dollars, the price of a bicycle. The Municipal Court rendered judgment in favor of the plaintiff in the sum of twenty-two dollars and sixteen cents damages, three dollars and sixty-two cents costs, two dollars and seventy-two cents prospective costs; total, twenty-eight dollars and fifty cents. This is the second appeal by the plaintiff, the first appeal having been from a judgment dismissing the complaint, with costs, which judgment was reversed by-order entered June 19, 1900. The facts are as follows:

On March 29, 1899, one Becker entered into a…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Baumann v. CornezNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1890
  2. Equitable General Providing Co. v. PotterAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1897
  3. Equitable General Providing Co. v. EisentragerAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1900

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Matter of N.Y. World-Telegram Corp. v. McGoldrickNew York Court of Appeals · 1948
  2. In re Merkel, Inc. Monarch Marking System Co.New York Supreme Court · 1965
  3. McLean v. BlochAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1907

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API