Spiegle v. Cincinnati, New Orleans & Texas Pacific Railroad
Court of Appeals of Kentucky
Appeal from Lincoln Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the Court
, Opinion of the Court by
Judge Clarke
Affirming.
This action was brought against appellee by Ives Spiegle, an infant, suing by ber father, Harry Spiegle, as her next friend, to recover for personal injuries inflicted in June, 1913, alleged to havé been caused by the negligence of appellee in running its train against and upon her.
*286The-answer is a traverse of the petition, and upon a trial by a jury a verdict was returned in favor of appellee, and appellant’s petition dismissed.
Only two grounds are presented for reversal: (1) That the court erred in refusing to give instruction “A” offered by…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Cahill v. CincinnatiCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1891
- Becker v. L. & N. R. R.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1901
- Early's Admr. v. Louisville, H. & St. L. Ry. Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1903
- Goodman's Admr. v. Louisville & N. R. R.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1903
- Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co. v. Hunter's AdministratorCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1916
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. Mann's AdministratorCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1929
- Stull's Administratrix v. Kentucky Traction & Terminal Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1916
- Ray v. RayCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1922
- Lee's Admr. v. HinesCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1924
- Wimsatt's Administratrix v. Louisville & Nashville RailroadCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1930
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.