Prows v. INDUSTRIAL COM'N OF UTAH
Utah Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
WILKINS, Justice:
This is an appeal from an Order of the Industrial Commission (hereafter “Commission”) denying the application for Workmen’s Compensation benefits by Michael Prows (hereafter “Petitioner”).
The facts of this case are essentially undisputed. Petitioner was employed as a truck driver by Respondent Bergin Brun-swig Company (hereafter “Bergin”). His duties included loading medical supplies onto his delivery truck and making deliveries to doctors, hospitals, and clinics.
The boxes containing the medical supplies measured approximately eleven and one-half by twenty-four inches, and…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. CardilloCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1940
- Matter of Leonbruno v. . Champlain Silk MillsNew York Court of Appeals · 1920
- Crilly v. BallouMichigan Supreme Court · 1958
- Stark v. State Industrial Accident CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1922
- Gurski v. Susquehanna Coal Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1918
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Kaiser Steel Corp. v. Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1985
- Woods v. Asplundh Tree Expert Co.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1992
- Grabowski v. ManglerSupreme Court of Delaware · 2008
- J & W Janitorial Co. v. Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1983
- Lori's Family Dining, Inc. v. Industrial Claim Appeals OfficeColorado Court of Appeals · 1995
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.