Legal Opinion

Edwards v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)

Decided March 10, 1993No. 08-92-00150-CRPublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BARAJAS, Justice.

OPINION

This is an appeal from a judgment of conviction for the felony offense of possession of a controlled substance, i.e., cocaine, énhanced by two prior felony convictions. Appellant waived trial by jury and entered a plea of guilty pursuant to a plea agreement. Upon conviction, the trial court found both prior felony convictions to be true and assessed punishment in the Institutional Division of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice for a term of 25 years. In two points of error, Appellant challenges the judgment of conviction. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Simmons v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  3. Rakas v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  4. Jones v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  5. Bumper v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1968

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Ortiz v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2004
  2. Lee v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)1994
  3. Gaines v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)1994
  4. Brian Charles Frankenfield Jr. v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2008
  5. Brian Charles Frankenfield Jr. v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2008

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API