Legal Opinion

La Marche v. New York Life Ins. Co.

California Supreme Court

Decided October 30, 1899No. Sac. No. 489PublishedCited by 10 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

BRITT, C.

—Action for damages sustained by plaintiff because of fraud alleged to have been practiced on him by defendant, a life insurance company, through the instrumentality of one Eaton, its agent, whereby defendant obtained from plaintiff his negotiable promissory note for the sum óf four hundred and thirty dollars and fifty cents, ostensibly in payment of the first annual premium on a policy of insurance to be issued on his life, which note plaintiff was subsequently compelled to pay to a third person holding the same. At the trial defendant moved for judgment of nonsuit on the evidence…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Rowley v. . the Empire Insurance Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1867
  2. Continental Life Insurance v. ChamberlainSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
  3. Splawn v. ChewTexas Supreme Court · 1883
  4. Kausal v. Minnesota Farmers' Mutual Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1883
  5. George H. Fitchner & Co. v. Fidelity Mutual Fire Ass'nSupreme Court of Iowa · 1897

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Suravitz v. Prudential InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1914
  2. Summers v. Mutual Life Insurance Co. of New YorkWyoming Supreme Court · 1904
  3. Evans v. Central Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1912
  4. Summers v. AlexanderSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
  5. Kramm v. Stockton Electric R. R. Co.California Court of Appeal · 1909

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API