Legal Opinion

Hazlitt v. Provident Life & Accident Ins. Co.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided June 2, 1948No. 11839PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The case is before us as the result of the sustaining of a special exception and the refusal to amend, which resulted in the dismissal of the cause.

The appellant, as plaintiff below, sought to recover upon an accident policy issued to his wife as insured, by the appellee.

The policy provided that:

"If the insured is disabled by such injury for more than thirty days, he or his representative shall, as a condition precedent to any liability of the Company here-under, furnish the Company at its principal offices in Chattanooga, Tennessee, every thirty days thereafter (or as near thereto as may be…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Federal Surety Co. v. SmithTexas Commission of Appeals · 1931
  2. Burns v. American Nat. Ins.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1926
  3. Sun Mutual Insurance v. Mattingly & RicketsTexas Supreme Court · 1890
  4. East Texas Fire Ins.v. CoffeeTexas Supreme Court · 1884
  5. Washington Nat. Ins. Co. v. BookerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1938

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Hubler v. City of Corpus ChristiCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1978
  2. McCreight v. City of Cleburne, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)1997
  3. Provident Life & Accident Insurance v. HazlittTexas Supreme Court · 1949
  4. Yarborough v. Industrial Accident BoardCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1976
  5. Viles v. Security National Insurance Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1990

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API