People v. Ashley
California Supreme Court
1Concurring in part, dissenting in part
SCHAUER, J., Concurring and Dissenting.
I concur in the judgment solely on the ground that the evidence establishes, with ample corroboration, the making by the defendant of false representations as to existing facts. On that evidence the convictions should be sustained pursuant to long accepted theories of law.
It is unnecessary on the record to make of this rather simple case a vehicle for the revolutionary holding, contrary to the weight of authority in this state and elsewhere, that a promise to pay or perform at a future date, if unfulfilled, can become the basis for a criminal prosecution…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- People v. JonesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
- People v. GordonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945
- People v. RobinsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
- People v. RabeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
- People v. JacksonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.