Legal Opinion

Wheeler v. Vanderveer

New York Supreme Court

Decided July 5, 1895PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal from Onondaga county court. Action by Gardner H. Wheeler, as receiver of the property and effects of Alfred E. Crane, against Jewell Vanderveer. From a judgment of the county court affirming a judgment rendered by the municipal court of the city of Syracuse, plaintiff appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtMabtin, J.

Upon the trial the plaintiff was nonsuited. The grounds upon which the plaintiff now seeks to reverse the judgment herein are twofold: (1) That the court erred in rejecting evidence offered by him as to the price paid for the property in question; and *800(2) that the court érred in granting the defendant’s motion for a non-suit.

As evidence of the price paid for the property could have heen material only upon the question of damages, the rulings of the court in rejecting it, if erroneous, were harmless, if the defendant’s motion for a nonsuit was properly granted. If the nonsuit was improperly…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Thompson v. St. Nicholas National BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
  2. Duncan v. . BrennanNew York Court of Appeals · 1881
  3. Fish v. SkutNew York Supreme Court · 1856
  4. Wood v. . OrserNew York Court of Appeals · 1862
  5. Austin v. WaufulNew York Supreme Court · 1891

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Krebs Hop Co. v. TaylorOregon Supreme Court · 1908

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API