Legal Opinion

Wood v. . Orser

New York Court of Appeals

Decided September 5, 1862PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The plaintiffs could only maintain the action by showing that they were the owners of the cloths, and entitled to the possession of them, and that they were tortiously taken and detained by the defendant.

1. As to their title: Between February and June, 1853, the plaintiffs furnished to Smith Brothers, calico printers, near Philadelphia, some 6,000 or 7,000 pieces of cloths, for printing, under an agreement of the following nature: The plaintiffs were to buy the cloths, and Smith Brothers to print them; after being printed, and returned to the plaintiffs, they were to advance one cent per yard…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Wintringham v. LafoyNew York Supreme Court · 1827
  2. Hurd v. WestNew York Supreme Court · 1827
  3. Hyde & Everit v. CooksonNew York Supreme Court · 1855
  4. Jenkins v. EichelbergerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1835
  5. Bush v. LyonNew York Supreme Court · 1828

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Hofferman v. SimmonsNew York Court of Appeals · 1943
  2. Hall v. JennessSupreme Court of Kansas · 1870
  3. Segelke v. FinanNew York Supreme Court · 1888
  4. Wolf v. FarleyNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1891
  5. Eisler v. Union Transfer & Storage Co.New York Court of Common Pleas · 1891

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API