Legal Opinion

Kent v. Bartlett

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 3, 1975No. Civ. 34141PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

ROUSE, J.

Plaintiffs Robert and Theresa Kent brought this action against defendant William Bartlett to recover damages allegedly occa sioned by his negligence in making a survey of certain real property.

Defendant, by way of answer, denied the charging allegations of the complaint and asserted that plaintiffs had failed to state a cause of action because it was not alleged, that there was any privity of contract between plaintiffs and defendant. Defendant also raised the affirmative defenses of contributory negligence and assumption of the risk.

When the case came on for trial, defendant…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Biakanja v. IrvingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
  2. Lucas v. HammCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
  3. Rozny v. MarnulIllinois Supreme Court · 1969
  4. Buckley v. GrayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
  5. M. Miller Co. v. Dames & MooreCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Price-Orem Investment Co. v. Rollins, Brown & Gunnell, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Huber, Hunt & Nichols, Inc. v. MooreCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
  3. In Re National Mortgage Equity Corp. Mortgage Pool Certificates Securities LitigationDistrict Court, C.D. California · 1987
  4. Carlotta v. T.R. Stark & Associates, Inc.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1984
  5. Bell v. RenaldoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API