Appeal of New Orleans, Texas & Mexico Railway Co.
United States Board of Tax Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
*439OPINION.
Maequette :
The first question presented herein is whether or not the taxpayer realized any income as the result of the purchase by it in the year 1918 of its own bonds for less than their par value. A similar question was presented to the Supreme Court of' the United States in the case of Bowers v. Kerbaugh-Empire Co., 271 U. S. 170. The facts in that case were that the Kerbaugh Empire Co. prior to July 2, 1913, borrowed from the Deutsche Bank of Germany the amount of $1,983,000. The loan was evidenced by notes payable, as to principal and interest, in marks or their equivalent in…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Eisner v. MacOmberSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
- Brushaber v. Union Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Doyle v. Mitchell Brothers Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1918
- United States v. PhellisSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
- Irwin v. GavitSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Baltimore & O. R. Co. v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1934
- Baltimore & O. R. Co. v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1934
- Chicago, R. I. & P. R. Co. v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1928
- Eastern Steamship Lines v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1929
- Gulf, Mobile & N. R.R. v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1931
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.