Pierce v. B.P.O. of Elks Lodge No. 1214
North Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
MARING, Justice.
[¶ 1] William A. and Carol Pierce appealed from judgments dismissing their action against B.P.O. of Elks Lodge No. 1214 (“Elks”) for breach of a business lease agreement and related damages. We conclude genuine issues of material fact exist which precluded the district court from dismissing the Pierces’ claims through summary judgment. We reverse and remand for further proceedings.
I
[¶ 2] In the fall of 1994, the Elks in Williston leased part of its premises to the Pierces for the purpose of establishing a dining room and lounge business. The written lease agreement ran from…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Reid v. Mutual of Omaha Insurance Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1989
- Schneiker v. GordonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1987
- Sommer v. KridelSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1977
- Fetch v. QuamNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2001
- Hoffner v. JohnsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2003
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Groleau v. Bjornson Oil Co., Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2004
- Abelmann v. SmartLease USA, LLCDistrict Court, D. North Dakota · 2020
- Groleau v. Bjornson Oil Co., Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2004