Legal Opinion
Taylor v. Mutual of Omaha Insurance Company
District Court, E.D. Louisiana
Decided October 6, 2023No. 2:23-cv-01438Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA TANISHA TAYLOR CIVIL ACTION VERSUS NO. 23-1438 MUTUAL OF OMAHA SECTION M (1) INSURANCE COMPANY ORDER & REASONS Before the Court is a motion for partial summary judgment filed by defendant Mutual of Omaha Insurance Company (“Mutual of Omaha”) seeking to establish that plaintiff is not entitled to statutory penalties or attorney fees under La. R.S. 22:1821(A) or to the policy’s auto/pedestrian accidental death benefit.1 Plaintiff Tanisha Taylor responds in opposition,2 and Mutual of Omaha replies in further support of its motion.3…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Lujan v. National Wildlife FederationSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Little v. Liquid Air Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.