Barnett v. PA CONSULTING GROUP, INC.
District Court, District of Columbia
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
BARBARA JACOBS ROTHSTEIN, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
This matter comes before the court on Defendant PA Consulting Group, Inc.’s (“PA”) Motion for Summary Judgment pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rules for the District of Columbia 7.1 and 56.1. From October 2000 to November 2003, Plaintiff Judith Barnett worked as a Managing Consultant in PA’s Transportation Group. In October 2003, PA merged the Transportation Group into its Information Technology Infrastructure Group (“ITI”), thereby eliminating…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Judith Barnett v. PA Consulting Group, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2013