Legal Opinion

State v. Barton

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided June 22, 1977No. 2275-3PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGreen, J.

Discretionary review was granted by the Commissioner to consider one question:

When a mistrial has been declared because a jury cannot reach a verdict, do the time limits of CrR 3.3 run anew from the date of the mistrial to the date of the second trial?

Defendant was charged with second-degree murder as a result of a shooting on August 21, 1976. He entered a preliminary appearance on August 23, and was released on bail. Trial commenced November 1 and on November 5, a mistrial was declared because the jury was unable to reach a verdict. The Court Administrator scheduled the case for retrial on…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. StrikerWashington Supreme Court · 1976
  2. State v. ParmeleWashington Supreme Court · 1976
  3. State v. ElizondoWashington Supreme Court · 1975
  4. State v. BeppleCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1975

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. State v. BartonWashington Supreme Court · 1980
  2. State v. ChristopherCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1978
  3. Sundberg v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1982
  4. State v. BartonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1978
  5. State v. BartonWashington Supreme Court · 1980

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API