Brown v. Tri-State Insurance Co. & Securities Acceptance Corp.
Supreme Court of Kansas
1DissentWertz, J.
I cannot agree with the majority opinion which fell to my lot to write, nor can I bring myself to the conclusion that the agreement entered into by the parties in the instant case constituted a conditional sale as that term is used in the commercial field, or as contemplated by the exclusionary provision of the insurance policy. A conditional sale in the commercial field of law has a definite meaning as hereinafter related.
Provisions frequently appear in theft, fire and collision policies *12upon automobiles making the policy void if any change other than by death of the insured takes place in…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Luke v. Mercantile Acceptance Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1952
- Pomeroy v. Ætna InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1912
- Bowden v. Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
- Bisi v. American Automobile InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1951
- Koenke v. Iowa Home Mutual Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1953