Legal Opinion
UNIFUND CCR PARTNERS v. Lindsey
Court of Appeals of Utah
Decided March 22, 2012No. 20100794-CAPublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM DECISION
CHRISTIANSEN, Judge:
{1 Defendant Nicholas Lindsey appeals from the court proceedings that resulted in an August 20, 2010 order reinstating a previously entered default judgment in favor of plaintiff Unifund CCR Partners (Unifund). We reverse and remand.
12 On July 19, 2006, Unifund initiated a debt collection action against Lindsey. Uni-fund was apparently unable to locate Lindsey and filed three motions to extend the time for service pursuant to rule 4 of the Utah Rules of Civil Procedure. See Utah R. Civ. P. 4(b)@G). The trial court granted all three motions, and…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Amica Mutual Insurance Co. v. SchettlerCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1989
- Kilpatrick v. Bullough Abatement, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 2008
- Morton v. Continental Baking Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1997
- United States v. Vincente Espinoza, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2012
- Castro v. Collecto, Inc.District Court, W.D. Texas · 2009
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Unifund CCR Partners v. LindseyCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2012