Legal Opinion

ASHLEY RIVER INDUSTRIES, INC. v. Mobil Oil Corp.

District Court, D. South Carolina

Decided August 8, 2000No. CIV. A. 2:98-2964-12PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

HOUCK, Chief Judge.

This action was brought by Ashley River Industries (“ARI”) and Coastal Marine Enterprises (“CME”) (collectively “plaintiffs”) against Mobil Oil Corporation, Mobil Chemical Company and Mobil Corporation (collectively “Mobil” or “defendants”), alleging fraud, negligence, negligence per se, money had and received, nuisance, and seeking a declaration of responsibility. At issue is the lead and arsenic contamination of 9.65 acres of industrial property located on the Ashley River in “the neck” area of North Charleston, South Carolina. The matter is currently before the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Dean v. Ruscon Corp.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1996
  3. Campus Sweater & Sportswear Co. v. M. B. Kahn Construction Co.District Court, D. South Carolina · 1979
  4. Santee Portland Cement Co. v. Daniel International Corp.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1989
  5. Atlas Food Systems & Services, Inc. v. Crane National Vendors Division of Unidynamics Corp.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1995

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Parker v. Worcester InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2001
  2. Ashley River Industries, Inc. v. Mobil Oil Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2001
  3. Ashley River Industries, Incorporated v. Mobil Oil CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API