Legal Opinion · Dissent

Young Et Ux. v. Hansen Et Ux.

Utah Supreme Court

Decided May 16, 1950No. 7428Published

1DissentPratt, Chief Justice

Plaintiffs, vendees, brought this action upon the theory of a breach by defendants, vendors, of an oral modification of the original oral contract, by which modification it was claimed by plaintiffs that they were to receive the one-half interest in the property upon payment of the $4,000 and the partnership contract was to be entered into at that time; and that defendants failed to deliver at that time, or at all; and failed to enter into the partnership contract with them. The lower court found that there was no such modification of the original contract, and that defendants had not…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Shively v. Semi-Tropic Land & Water Co.California Supreme Court · 1893
  2. Joyce v. ShaferCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
  3. Reddish v. SmithWashington Supreme Court · 1894
  4. Baston v. CliffordIllinois Supreme Court · 1873
  5. Foxley v. RichUtah Supreme Court · 1909

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API