Legal Opinion

Bouche Et Ux v. Wagner Et Ux

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided February 8, 1956PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPebby, J.

This is a suit commenced by the plaintiffs to quiet their title in and to certain real property described in their complaint as follows:

‘ ‘Lot numbered 2 of section 12, township 9 south of range 1 east of the Willamette Meridian; the north half of the west half of the west half of section 7 in township 9 south of range 2 east of the Willamette Meridian; and lot 1 of section 12 in township 9 south of range 1 east of the Willamette Meridian, all in Marion County, Oregon.”

The defendants by answer allege ownership of a strip of land carved out of and running through the above-described real…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Joy v. St. LouisSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  2. New Mexico v. United States Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1898
  3. Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Co. v. RobertsSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  4. Blagen v. ThompsonOregon Supreme Court · 1892
  5. Bernards v. LinkOregon Supreme Court · 1953

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Brookbank v. Benedum-Trees Oil Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
  2. Department of Transportation v. Gypsum Ranch Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 2010
  3. Wiser v. ElliottCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2009
  4. Boyer v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2015
  5. Egaas v. Columbia CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1983

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API