Legal Opinion

State v. . Garner

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided April 3, 1912PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Appeal by defendant 'from Cooke, J., at December Term, 1911, of Mooee. The facts are sufficiently stated in the opinion of the Court by Mr. Chief Justice Clark.

1Opinion of the Court

Clabk, O. J.

Indictment under Revisa!, 3294, for “allowing” cattle to move from a quarantined area in North Carolina into that portion of the State lying north and west of the quarantine line established by the Board of Agriculture, i. e., from Hoke County into Moore.

The special verdict finds that defendant owned a cow which was infected with the cattle fever tick and permitted her to run at large in Hoke County, from his home, one-quarter of a mile from the county line, and she strayed into Moore County. It further appears that Hoke County is nonstock-law territory, and that there was no…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Kimmish v. BallSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
  2. State v. . R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1906

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Durham Provision Co. v. DavesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
  2. State v. . R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1906
  3. State v. ScogginSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
  4. State v. . HodgesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1920
  5. State v. . LovelaceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1947

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API