Legal Opinion

Corstorphine v. Bishop National Bank of Hawaii

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided February 20, 1935No. 2112PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OP THE COURT BY-

COKE, C. J. (Parsons, J., dissenting.)

Tile partnership firm of Williamson & Buttolph, for a long period of time prior and up to about June 8, 1932, was engaged in conducting a general stock brokerage business in the Territory of Hawaii, with headquarters at Honolulu. In 1924, or 1925, the plaintiff in error, James B. Corstorphine, assistant cashier of the Lihue branch of the Bank of Hawaii, opened an account with the broker which, from time to time, purchased and sold securities on the New York stock exchange through its New York correspondent for the account of…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Warfield v. AdamsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1913
  2. San Antonio Hardware Co. v. SangerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1912
  3. In re TooleCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1921
  4. King v. Mellon National BankSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1909
  5. Wolf v. American Trust & Savings BankCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1914

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. City Bank of Honolulu v. Artemio Rivera Davila, Gerasimo Rodriguez, (Two Cases)Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1971

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API