Legal Opinion

Ronald E. Rousseau v. Judge Kimberly Craven, in her official capacity as CRST Attorney General; and Brenda Claymore, in her official capacity as CRST Chief Judge

District Court, D. South Dakota

Decided May 27, 2026No. 3:25-cv-03028Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF SOUTH DAKOTA CENTRAL DIVISION RONALD E. ROUSSEAU, 3:25-CV-03028-RAL Petitioner, OPINION AND ORDER ADOPTING vs. REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION IN PART AND DISMISSING PETITION _ JUDGE KIMBERLY CRAVEN, IN HER WITHOUT PREJUDICE OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS CRST ATTORNEY GENERAL; AND BRENDA CLAYMORE, IN HER OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS CRST CHIEF JUDGE; Respondents. Ronald Rousseau filed a pro se petition for a writ of habeas corpus under

25 U.S.C. § 1303

and

28 U.S.C. § 2241

challenging his November 2025 arrest and detention by the Cheyenne River Sioux Tribe (CRST). Docs. 1, 1-1.…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Hensley v. Municipal Court, San Jose-Milpitas Judicial Dist., Santa Clara Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. National Farmers Union Insurance v. Crow Tribe of IndiansSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Iowa Mutual Insurance v. LaPlanteSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  4. Justices of Boston Municipal Court v. LydonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. Ninigret Development Corp. v. Narragansett Indian Wetuomuck Housing AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2000

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API