Ninigret Development Corp. v. Narragansett Indian Wetuomuck Housing Authority
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
SELYA, Circuit Judge.
This matter requires us to explore the complex web of considerations that envelops the interrelationship between federal courts and. Indian tribal courts. We conclude that the district court had subject-matter jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1331. Withal, the scope of that jurisdiction was narrow, enabling the court, in effect, only to pass upon (1) the extent of the tribal court’s jurisdiction over the plaintiffs claims, and (2) the defendant’s assertion that, as an arm of a federally recognized Indian tribe, the impervious shield of tribal sovereign immunity protected it…
2Cases cited45 opinions
- Caterpillar Inc. v. LewisSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Strawbridge v. CurtissSupreme Court of the United States · 1806
- Santa Clara Pueblo v. MartinezSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Newman-Green, Inc. v. Alfonzo-LarrainSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Worcester v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1832
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by122 opinions
- Mark S. Allen v. Gold Country Casino the Berry Creek Rancheria of Tyme Maidu Indians Mattie MayhewCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
- Deborah Jackson v. Payday Financial, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2014
- Breakthrough Management Group, Inc. v. Chukchansi Gold Casino & ResortCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2010
- D.B. Zwirn Special Opportunities Fund, L.P. v. MehrotraCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2011
- Silva v. Encyclopedia Britannica Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2001
117 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.