Legal Opinion

Balash v. New York City Employees' Retirement System

New York Court of Appeals

Decided March 29, 1974PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Memorandum. The procedures by which petitioner was “ certified ” a “ paranoid ” personality and involuntarily retired from his position with the New York City Housing Authority with ordinary disability benefits did not meet the rmTnmnm requirements of due process. The only written notice given petitioner was a letter of February 3, 1972, from the respondent Retirement System stating that his employer had applied for his retirement “ on account of Ordinary Dis*656ability ” and requesting his attendance at an “ interview ” on February 10, 1972, before the medical panel. He was given no written…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Matter of Newbrand v. City of YonkersNew York Court of Appeals · 1941

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Basciano v. HerkimerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1978
  2. Basciano v. HerkimerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1978
  3. Francine Newman v. The Board of Education of the City School District of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1979
  4. Surowitz v. New York City Employees' Retirement SystemDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1974
  5. Siletti v. New York City Employees' Retirement SystemDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1975

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API