Harris v. Harris
Supreme Court of South Carolina
Before Wieson, J., Pickens, April, 1914. Action by T. D. Plarris against J. F. Plarris and others. From a judgment for defendants, plaintiff appeals.
Read the full summary
Before Wieson, J., Pickens, April, 1914. Action by T. D. Plarris against J. F. Plarris and others. From a judgment for defendants, plaintiff appeals. The exceptions are as follows: The plaintiff appeals to the Supreme Court from the judgment entered upon the verdict in this case upon the following grounds : 1. Error of the presiding Judge in admitting, over the plaintiff’s objection, the following testimony of the witness (defendant), John F. Plarris: “Q. I want you to tell your connection with T. D. Harris. A. Well, we agreed upon the terms of the contract. Q. What were they? A. The terms of…
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the Court was delivered by
Mr. ChieT Justice Gary.
This is an action to recover $982.50, alleged to be due the plaintiff by the defendants, for failure, on the' part of the defendants, to comply with their part of an agreement in writing, which contains, substantially, these provisions: Whereas, T. D. Harris has this day deeded to John E. Harris, W. T. Jeans, M. C. Smith, and W. T. Bates a certain tract of land, for the sum of $4,320, which is at the rate of $30 per acre, according to the survey made by G. A. Ellis, October 13, 1909, which survey only shows 144 acres, which is…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Holliday v. PegramSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1911
- Madden & Co. v. Phoenix Ins.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1904
- Hodges v. KohnSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1903
- Watson v. PaschallSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1913
- Glover v. GasqueSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1903
3Cited by3 opinions
- Military Art Novelty Co. v. FayonskySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1920
- Blackwell v. FaucettSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1921
- Gladden v. KeistlerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1927