Legal Opinion

Glover v. Gasque

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided July 7, 1903PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Before Klugh, J., Colleton, March, 1902. Action for partition by Eleanor L. Glover against Mabel Yonge Gasque et al. From judgment for defendants other than heirs of Mary E. Grace, the plaintiff and the heirs of Mary E. Grace appeal, the plaintiff on the following exceptions : “1. Because, while the title to the land in dispute depended entirely on written documents, he left it to the jury to construe such written documents, to wit: a.

Read the full summary

Before Klugh, J., Colleton, March, 1902. Action for partition by Eleanor L. Glover against Mabel Yonge Gasque et al. From judgment for defendants other than heirs of Mary E. Grace, the plaintiff and the heirs of Mary E. Grace appeal, the plaintiff on the following exceptions : “1. Because, while the title to the land in dispute depended entirely on written documents, he left it to the jury to construe such written documents, to wit: a. He should have charged that the will in evidence and not disputed was Dr. Joseph Glover’s will, probated in 1840, and construed it, stating its terms and their…

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice Gary.

This is an action for the partition of certain lands described in the complaint, in which all the appellants claim to be tenants in common, and that the respondents were in possession of certain portions of said lands respectively and claimed some interest therein. The defendants in possession answered the complaint, setting up (1) a general denial of the title alleged in the complaint; (2) that they were the exclusive owners in fee of the several parcels occupied by them; and (3) adverse possession. The question of title raised by the…

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. Holliday v. PegramSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1911
  2. Powers v. RawlsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1922
  3. Lane v. MIMSSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1952
  4. Watson v. PaschallSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1913
  5. Cooper & Griffin, Inc. v. W. C. Cooke & Co., Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1922

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API