Legal Opinion

McNaught & Co. v. Bostick

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided December 4, 1883PublishedCited by 2 opinions

• Partnership. Statute of Limitations. Parties. Before Judge Carswell. Washington Superior Court. March Term, 1883. Reported in the decision.

1Opinion of the Court

Blandeorb, Justice.

The plaintiffs brought their action against Joseph M. G. Medloek, and A. O. Bostick, as administrator of B. W. Holt, alleging that the late firm of Medloek & Holt were indebted to them upon an account. At the trial term, the plaintiffs discontinued their case as to Medloek, surviving partner, and proceeded against Bostick, administrator of Holt, deceased, and obtained judgment. Defendant Bostick, administrator, moved for a new trial, upon the ground that the verdict was contrary to law and evidence, and because the court erred in allowing plaintiff to discontinue the case…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Pullen v. WhitfieldSupreme Court of Georgia · 1875

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Beste v. BurgerNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1885
  2. Blackstock v. MurphySupreme Court of Georgia · 1965

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API