Legal Opinion

Clark County v. Mullen

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided March 18, 1975No. 7849PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*173OPINION

By the Court,

Manoukian, D. J.:

In a prior appeal between the parties this court resolved the issue of liability against appellants and remanded the case for further trial on the issue of the amount of overtime compensation due respondent. See Mullen v. Clark County, 89 Nev. 308, 511 P.2d 1036 (1973). The facts of the case are fully set out in that opinion.

At the subsequent trial the district judge concluded the evidence established respondent had worked a total of 6447 hours of overtime between April 1961 and September 1968, for which he had not been compensated.1 On June 6, 1974,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Paradise Homes, Inc. v. Central Surety and Ins. Corp.Nevada Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Brandon v. TravitskyNevada Supreme Court · 1970
  3. Havas v. CarterNevada Supreme Court · 1973
  4. Mullen v. Clark CountyNevada Supreme Court · 1973
  5. Dunn v. City of Carson CityNevada Supreme Court · 1972

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Schoepe v. Pacific Silver Corp.Nevada Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Hartunian v. RacusinCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
  3. Pederson v. OwenNevada Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Pangborn v. National Advertising Co.Nevada Supreme Court · 1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API