People v. Alvarez
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BAXTER, J.
To convict an accused of a criminal offense, the prosecution must prove that (1) a crime actually occurred, and (2) the accused was the *1165perpetrator. Though no statute or constitutional principle requires it, California, like most American jurisdictions, has historically adhered to the rule that the first of these components—the corpus delicti or body of the crime— cannot be proved by exclusive reliance on the defendant’s extrajudicial statements.
In practice, the corpus delicti rule operates in several ways. The defendant may object to the admission of his extrajudicial…
2Cases cited73 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- People v. WatsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
- Opper v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- People v. Lance W.California Supreme Court · 1985
- People v. BeagleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
68 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- People v. AlvarezCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002