Legal Opinion

State v. McCusker

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided December 1, 1972No. 15-823 and No. 15-824PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSchwab, C.J.

Upon separate trials, defendant was convicted of accessory after the fact, former ORS 161.230, to an assault with a dangerous weapon, and possession of a dangerous drug, ORS 475.100. His appeals from both convictions were consolidated before this court.

His sole assignment of error as to the drug conviction is that the trial court failed to suppress the drugs seized from his person. This assignment has no merit.

Defendant did not make a timely motion to suppress. A motion to suppress evidence allegedly illegally seized must be made prior to trial unless defendant was unaware of the seizure or…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. CliffordOregon Supreme Court · 1972
  2. State v. CapitanCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1972
  3. State v. MarcusCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1970
  4. State v. BunchOregon Supreme Court · 1968

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Aschenbrenner v. Employment DivisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1977
  2. Coffey v. Employment DivisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API