Legal Opinion

Eagle v. YERINGTON PAIUTE TRIBE

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided May 7, 2010No. 08-16786PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

THOMPSON, Senior Circuit Judge:

Leslie Dawn Eagle challenges her conviction of criminal child abuse in the tribal court for the Yerington Paiute Tribe. Dawn Eagle contends she was denied due process because the Tribe failed to allege and prove beyond a reasonable doubt that she was an “Indian,” which, according to Dawn Eagle, is a necessary element of her crime of conviction. The district court concluded that Indian status, although a requirement for tribal jurisdiction, was not an element of the crime and denied Dawn Eagle’s habeas corpus petition. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C.…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Morton v. MancariSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Oliphant v. Suquamish Indian TribeSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. United States v. AntelopeSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  4. Duro v. ReinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  5. United States v. LaraSupreme Court of the United States · 2004

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Safe Streets Alliance v. HickenlooperCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2017
  2. State v. HillCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2016
  3. Las Vegas Tribe of Paiute Indians v. PhebusDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2014
  4. Eagle v. Yerington Paiute TribeSupreme Court of the United States · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API