State ex rel. Ham v. Hulley
Indiana Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtEwbank, J.
Appellant’s relator brought an action of mandamus against the eight appellees, alleged to be the mayor and common council of the city of Marion, Indiana, asking that the defendants (appellees) be required “to pay the relator his salary” as a patrolman of said city from July 15, 1914, to August 15, 1918, a period of four years and one month. Neither the city of Marion as a corporation nor any of its officers other than the mayor and councilmen was made a party to the action. A demurrer to the complaint was overruled, and demurrers to each of the third, fourth, fifth, sixth and eighth…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- People ex rel. Blachly v. CoffinIllinois Supreme Court · 1917
- People ex rel. Sartison v. SchmidtIllinois Supreme Court · 1917
- People ex rel. Durante v. BurdettIllinois Supreme Court · 1918
- City of Terre Haute v. BurnsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1917
- Samuels v. Town of HarringtonWashington Supreme Court · 1906
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- City of Peru v. State Ex Rel. McGuireIndiana Supreme Court · 1936
- City of East Chicago v. State Ex Rel. PitzerIndiana Supreme Court · 1949
- City of Huntington v. FisherIndiana Supreme Court · 1942
- Morton v. City of AuroraIndiana Court of Appeals · 1932
- State Ex Rel. Anderson v. Brand, TrusteeIndiana Supreme Court · 1937