State v. Finley
Court of Appeals of South Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
WILLIAMS, J.:
**420In this criminal appeal, Michael Jay Finley appeals the circuit court's denial of his pro se motion to reconsider his sentence pursuant *159to Aiken v. Byars , 410 S.C. 534, 765 S.E.2d 572 (2014). Finley argues his mandatory sentence of life imprisonment with the possibility of parole upon the service of **421thirty years' imprisonment is functionally equivalent to a sentence of life imprisonment without the possibility of parole (LWOP), which violates the Eighth Amendment's prohibition of cruel and unusual punishments. We affirm.
FACTS/PROCEDURAL HISTORY
In February 1992, a…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Miller v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
- Roper v. SimmonsSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Graham v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
- Montgomery v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
- Aiken v. ByarsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2014
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Heying v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1987
- State v. GulleySupreme Court of Kansas · 2022
- State v. MillerCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2021
- State v. MorganCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2021
- State v. SmartCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2021