Legal Opinion
Smithson v. HOWARD REGIONAL HEALTH SYSTEM
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided August 2, 2010No. 34A02-1001-CT-73PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BAILEY, Judge. 1
Case Summary
Saundra and Clyde Smithson appeal the entry of summary judgment in favor of Howard Regional Health System ("Howard Regional"). We reverse and remand.
Issue
The Smithsons raise multiple issues on appeal, which we consolidate and restate as whether the trial court erred in concluding that Howard Regional was immune from liability under the Indiana Tort Claim Act ("Act") for a loss resulting from the temporary weather condition of its parking lot. 2
Facts and Procedural History
The following are the facts most favorable to the Smithsons, the non-movants, per the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Owens Corning Fiberglass Corp. v. CobbIndiana Supreme Court · 2001
- Catt v. Board of Com'rs of Knox CountyIndiana Supreme Court · 2002
- Filip v. BlockIndiana Supreme Court · 2008
- Willis v. WesterfieldIndiana Supreme Court · 2006
- Bules v. Marshall CountyIndiana Supreme Court · 2010
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Bell v. Grandville Cooperative, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2011
- Pichon v. American Heritage Banco, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2013
- John Pichon, Jr. v. American Heritage Banco, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2013