Legal Opinion

Musselman v. Governor of Michigan

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided July 19, 1993No. Docket 142142PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtReilly, P.J.

In this original mandamus action, plaintiffs challenge the legality of Executive Order 1991-17 and 1991 PA 119 and seek to compel state *659officials to transfer monies from the State School Aid Fund to the Public School Employees’ Retirement System (Retirement System). Plaintiffs’ request for a writ of mandamus is denied.

Plaintiffs are individuals who are either current or retired public school employees who have accrued or are drawing benefits from the Retirement System. 1980 PA 300, as amended, MCL 38.1301 et seq.; MSA 15.893(111) et seq. Plaintiffs seek a declaration that Executive Order…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. People ex rel. Sutherland v. GovernorMichigan Supreme Court · 1874
  2. Wayne Circuit Judges v. Wayne CountyMichigan Supreme Court · 1971
  3. Wayne Circuit Judges v. Wayne CountyMichigan Supreme Court · 1969
  4. City of Jackson v. Com'r of RevenueMichigan Supreme Court · 1947
  5. Teasel v. Department of Mental HealthMichigan Supreme Court · 1984

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Musselman v. GovernorMichigan Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Flint City Council v. StateMichigan Court of Appeals · 2003
  3. Attorney General v. Public Service CommissionMichigan Court of Appeals · 2001
  4. Attorney General v. Public Service CommissionMichigan Court of Appeals · 2001
  5. Musselman v. GovernorMichigan Supreme Court · 1995

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API