Legal Opinion

Bridenbaker v. Kissell

New York Supreme Court

Decided February 15, 1928PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Charles B. Wheeler, Official Beferee.

One Joseph Eglington in his lifetime was the owner of the properties in question. The plaintiff Carrie Bridenbaker and Uriah J. Eglington were the only children of Joseph Eglington, now deceased. Uriah J. Eglington, the son, survived his father, but died intestate in 1921. He had attempted to marry the defendant May Kissell, but this marriage was illegal and void for the reason the said May Kissell had a former husband living at the time of her marriage to Uriah J. Eglington. Uriah J. Eglington left him surviving no children of his blood, but with the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Pray v. . HegemanNew York Court of Appeals · 1885
  2. Honsinger v. . Union Carriage Gear Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1903

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Rutherford v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987
  2. Bridenbaker v. KissellAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1929
  3. In re the Estate of JesupNew York Surrogate's Court · 1936
  4. In re the Estate of CosterNew York Surrogate's Court · 1937
  5. Brown v. RosenbaumNew York Supreme Court · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API