Legal Opinion
National Labor Relations Board v. Winchell Processing Corporation and Winchell Donut House, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided November 18, 1971No. 71-1206PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
EUGENE A. WRIGHT, Circuit Judge:
The Labor Board petitions for enforcement of its bargaining order against respondent, Winchell Processing Corporation and Winchell Donut House. Following a representation election, the Board certified two unions, Bakery Drivers’ Local 276 (Teamsters) and the Bakery and Confectionery Workers’ International, as the joint bargaining representative of Winchell’s employees. The employer corporation asserts that false and misleading statements in the unions’ campaign literature vitiated the election. We agree and deny enforcement of the order.
Winchell makes donut…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- National Labor Relations Board v. Trancoa Chemical CorporationCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1962
- S. H. Kress & Company, Petitioner-Cross-Respondent v. National Labor Relations Board, Respondent-Cross-PetitionerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1970
3Cited by11 opinions
- National Labor Relations Board v. Sauk Valley Manufacturing Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1973
- National Labor Relations Board v. G. K. Turner AssociatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1972
- Heavenly Valley Ski Area, a California Corporation, and Heavenly Valley, a Partnership v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
- Warner Press, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board, and Indianapolis Printing Pressmen, Assistants and Offset Workers Union Number 17, IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1975
- National Labor Relations Board v. Masonic Homes of California, Inc., Hospital and Institutional Workers Union, Local 250, IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.