Legal Opinion

Pendergraft v. Phillips

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided April 5, 1916No. 6658PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Error from, County Court, Oklahoma, County; John W. Hayson, Judge. Action by Sarah J. Phillips against C. J. Pendergraft and others. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendants bring error.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

MATHEWS, C.

The parties will be designated as in the trial court. This is an action upon a promissory note. On August 31, 1910, the above-named defendants and I. Phillips executed a promissory note to the O’Bannon Banking Company of Buffalo, Mo. C-'J. Pendergraft was principal and the other signers his sureties. The principal having failed to pay the note, on May 10, 1912, the said I. Phillips paid the same by giving therefor his individual note, which he afterwards paid. At his request, the bank assigned the said note to his wife, Sarah J. Phillips, who instituted this action in…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Nelson v. WebsterNebraska Supreme Court · 1904
  2. Sherwood Ex Rel. State Bank v. CollierSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1832
  3. Mason v. PierronWisconsin Supreme Court · 1885
  4. McClure v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1898
  5. Ferd Heim Brewing Co. v. JordanMissouri Court of Appeals · 1905

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. City of Barnsdall v. Barnsdall Nat. BankSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
  2. Keyes v. DyerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1952
  3. Martin v. CooganSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
  4. Redford v. Crowe's AdministratrixCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1928
  5. Christburgh v. AndersonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API