Legal Opinion

Christburgh v. Anderson

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided March 16, 1937No. 26774PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

This action was instituted in the district court of Oklahoma county by Mary J. Christburgh, plaintiff in error, against Forest Anderson. Thereafter by stipulation of the parties, Forest Anderson, as administrator of the estate of D. Harriet Anderson, deceased, defendant in error, was made a party defendant. Hereinafter the parties will be referred to as they appeared in the trial court.

Plaintiff’s action was brought for the purpose of securing a judicial determination that D. Harriet Anderson, nee Christburgh, grantee in two deeds executed, respectively, on June 30, 1921, and April 19, 1922,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Bobier v. HornSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
  2. McClure v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1898
  3. Connecticut Fire Ins. Co. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1927
  4. Pendergraft v. PhillipsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  5. Dematte v. ClarkSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Wallace v. BrooksSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1944
  2. Alexander v. JamesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1945
  3. Peat v. BatesCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API